Capacity
Higher is better | Scale max: 2,042 Wh | Explorer 2000 v2 leads
Explorer 1000 v2 1,070 Wh
Explorer 2000 v2 2,042 Wh
Explorer 2000 v2: +972 Wh (+90.8%).
Explorer 1000 v2 vs Explorer 2000 v2
VS
1,500W
Running power
2,200W
1,070 Wh
Battery
2,042 Wh
23.8 lbs
Weight
39.5 lbs
At a Glance
This comparison targets buyers choosing between two Jackery LFP portable power stations that share the same battery chemistry, 4000-cycle lifespan, and 20ms UPS switchover, but differ significantly in capacity and output. The Explorer 2000 v2 nearly doubles the battery at 2042 Wh versus 1070 Wh and pushes running watts from 1500W to 2200W, with surge headroom climbing to 4400W.
That extra muscle shows in device compatibility: the 2000 v2 powered 45 of 53 tested appliances compared to 33 for the 1000 v2, earning a score of 88 versus 61. Both units accept 400W of solar input and work with the same 19 compatible panels, but the larger battery means the 2000 v2 needs roughly 14.6 hours of solar charge time versus 7.6 hours for its smaller sibling.
The tradeoff is weight: the 2000 v2 tips the scale at 39.5 lbs, adding nearly 16 pounds over the 23.8-lb 1000 v2.
Overall Winner
Explorer 2000 v2
Powers 45 of 53 tested devices vs 33 for Explorer 1000 v2
Home backup: Explorer 2000 v2 RV / mobile: Tie Solar: Explorer 1000 v2
Explorer 2000 v2 wins overall, but the best pick depends on your use case.
Choose Explorer 1000 v2 if...
- + Portability matters (24 lbs vs 40)
- + You want faster solar recharging
Choose Explorer 2000 v2 if...
- + You want broader device compatibility
- + You need all-day runtime headroom
Spec Snapshot
Absolute values shown. Bars are scaled within this comparison for readability.
Each metric is independent. Bar lengths are not comparable across different compare pages.
Running Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 2,200 W | Explorer 2000 v2 leads
Explorer 1000 v2 1,500 W
Explorer 2000 v2 2,200 W
Explorer 2000 v2: +700 W (+46.7%).
Surge Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 4,400 W | Explorer 2000 v2 leads
Explorer 1000 v2 3,000 W
Explorer 2000 v2 4,400 W
Explorer 2000 v2: +1,400 W (+46.7%).
Weight
Lower is better | Scale best: 23.8 lbs | Explorer 1000 v2 leads
Explorer 1000 v2 23.8 lbs (10.8 kg)
Explorer 2000 v2 39.5 lbs (17.9 kg)
Explorer 1000 v2: -15.7 lbs (39.7% lighter).
Battery Life
Higher is better | Scale max: 4,000 cycles | Tie
Explorer 1000 v2 4,000 cycles
Explorer 2000 v2 4,000 cycles
Delta: Tie (0%).
Where Compatibility Actually Differs
Out of 53 devices tested, 12 show a different result between these two stations.
Both can run: 33 · Differences: 23% (12/53) · Neither can run: 8
Only Explorer 2000 v2 can run 12
Coffee Maker Explorer 1000 v2: Running shortfall
Digital Air Fryer Explorer 1000 v2: Running shortfall
Electric Stove (Single Burner) Explorer 1000 v2: Running shortfall
Microwave Oven (1000W) Explorer 1000 v2: Running shortfall
Toaster Oven Explorer 1000 v2: Running shortfall
Portable AC (12,000 BTU) Explorer 1000 v2: Surge shortfall
Dehumidifier (70 Pint) Explorer 1000 v2: Needs soft-start
Corded Drill / Hammer Drill Explorer 1000 v2: Surge shortfall
Shop Vac (Wet/Dry, 5-6 HP Peak) Explorer 1000 v2: Surge shortfall
Sump Pump (1/2 HP) Explorer 1000 v2: Needs soft-start
Dishwasher Explorer 1000 v2: Running shortfall
Professional Hair Dryer Explorer 1000 v2: Running shortfall
Neither can run · 8 devices
These are 240V or high-voltage devices — neither station supports them.
Central AC (3-Ton)
Circular Saw (Corded)
Electric Chainsaw (14-inch)
Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon)
Electric Clothes Dryer
Electric Water Heater (50 Gal)
Well Pump (1 HP)
RV Rooftop AC (13,500 BTU)
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec | Explorer 1000 v2 | Explorer 2000 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1,070 Wh | 2,042 Wh ✓ |
| Running Power | 1,500 W | 2,200 W ✓ |
| Surge Power | 3,000 W | 4,400 W ✓ |
| Weight | 23.8 lbs (10.8 kg) ✓ | 39.5 lbs (17.9 kg) |
| Energy Density | 99.1 Wh/kg | 114.1 Wh/kg ✓ |
| Portability Tier | portable | portable |
| Chemistry | LFP | LFP |
| Cycle Life | 4,000 | 4,000 |
| Expandable | No | No |
| UPS | Yes (20 ms) | Yes (20 ms) |
| AC Voltage | 120V | 120V |
Solar Charging
Best-case charging profile using compatible solar panels.
Explorer 1000 v2
Faster Max solar input 400 W
Connector DC8020
Full charge time ~7.6h
Compatible panels 19/20
MPPT: 16-60V
Explorer 2000 v2
Max solar input 400 W
Connector DC8020
Full charge time ~14.6h
Compatible panels 19/20
MPPT: 16-60V
Charge speed comparison
Longer bar = faster charge (inverted scale)
Device Compatibility
All tested devices grouped by category. Click a category to expand.
Explorer 1000 v2Explorer 2000 v2
Emergency(2)
1/22/2
1/2
2/2
| Device | Explorer 1000 v2 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-Size Freezer (15-17 Cu. Ft.) | Safe | 4.7h | Safe | 8.9h |
| Sump Pump (1/2 HP) | Soft Start | 0.7h | Safe | 1.3h |
Entertainment(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
EV & Transportation(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
Heating & Cooling(7)
4/76/7
4/7
6/7
| Device | Explorer 1000 v2 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Box Fan (20-inch) | Safe | 9h | Safe | 17.2h |
| Central AC (3-Ton) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Dehumidifier (70 Pint) | Soft Start | 0.9h | Safe | 1.7h |
| Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) | Safe | 0.7h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Portable AC (12,000 BTU) | Fail | N/A | Tight | 1.1h |
| Space Heater (1,500W) | Tight | 0.5h | Safe | 1h |
| Window AC (8,000 BTU) | Safe | 1.1h | Safe | 2h |
Home Infrastructure(3)
1/31/3
1/3
1/3
| Device | Explorer 1000 v2 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Garage Door Opener (Residential) | Safe | 4.2h | Safe | 7.9h |
| Well Pump (1 HP) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
Kitchen Appliances(11)
6/1111/11
6/11
11/11
| Device | Explorer 1000 v2 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Slice Bread Toaster | Tight | 0.5h | Safe | 1h |
| Coffee Maker | Fail | N/A | Safe | 0.9h |
| Digital Air Fryer | Fail | N/A | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Skillet | Tight | 0.5h | Safe | 1h |
| Electric Stove (Single Burner) | Fail | N/A | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Water Kettle | Tight | 0.5h | Safe | 1h |
| Instant Pot (6 Qt) | Tight | 0.5h | Safe | 1h |
| Microwave Oven (1000W) | Fail | N/A | Safe | 0.7h |
| Rice Cooker | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 1.5h |
| Slow Cooker | Safe | 2.5h | Safe | 4.8h |
| Toaster Oven | Fail | N/A | Safe | 0.8h |
Large Appliances(4)
2/43/4
2/4
3/4
| Device | Explorer 1000 v2 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dishwasher | Fail | N/A | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Clothes Dryer | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| French Door Refrigerator | Safe | 3.6h | Safe | 6.9h |
| Washing Machine | Safe | 0.6h | Safe | 1.1h |
Medical(4)
4/44/4
4/4
4/4
Outdoor & RV(6)
5/65/6
5/6
5/6
Personal Care(2)
1/22/2
1/2
2/2
Power Tools(5)
0/52/5
0/5
2/5
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Our methodology
The Bottom Line
The Explorer 1000 v2 suits campers, tailgaters, and anyone who values portability at 23.8 lbs and only needs to run devices under 1500W. The Explorer 2000 v2 is the better fit for home backup and higher-draw appliances, covering 85% of the tested device list with 2200W of continuous output.
Overall, the Explorer 2000 v2 is the stronger pick for most buyers who can handle the extra weight. In our 53-device benchmark, Explorer 1000 v2 powers 33 devices and Explorer 2000 v2 powers 45.
Explorer 1000 v2 vs Explorer 2000 v2 FAQ
Q Which is better for home backup, Explorer 1000 v2 or Explorer 2000 v2?
Explorer 2000 v2 is the stronger overall choice in this matchup based on weighted compatibility across 53 tested devices.
Q Which has longer runtime, Explorer 1000 v2 or Explorer 2000 v2?
Explorer 2000 v2 has higher battery capacity (2,042 Wh), which generally supports longer runtime on the same load.
Q Which charges faster with solar panels?
Explorer 1000 v2 has the faster best-case solar recharge profile in our panel compatibility test set.
Q Which is more portable, Explorer 1000 v2 or Explorer 2000 v2?
Explorer 1000 v2 is lighter at 23.8 lbs vs 39.5 lbs. Explorer 1000 v2 is rated portable for portability.
Q How many devices can each power station run?
Explorer 2000 v2 powers 45 of 53 tested devices, compared to 33 for Explorer 1000 v2.