Capacity
Yeti Pro 4000: +1,952 Wh (+95.6%).
This comparison targets buyers choosing between a high-capacity home backup unit and a more portable everyday power station. The Yeti Pro 4000 delivers 3600W of running power and 3993.6 Wh of battery capacity, nearly doubling the Explorer 2000 v2's 2042 Wh and 2200W output.
That extra headroom shows in device coverage: the Yeti powers 47 out of 53 tested devices versus 45 for the Explorer. Solar input tells a similar story, with the Yeti accepting up to 3000W compared to just 400W on the Jackery.
The tradeoff is significant. At 115.7 lbs, the Yeti Pro 4000 is roughly three times the weight of the 39.5 lb Explorer, and it lacks UPS functionality, which the Explorer 2000 v2 provides with a 20ms switchover.
Overall Winner
Yeti Pro 4000
Powers 47 of 53 tested devices vs 45 for Explorer 2000 v2
Yeti Pro 4000 wins overall, but the best pick depends on your use case.
Absolute values shown. Bars are scaled within this comparison for readability.
Each metric is independent. Bar lengths are not comparable across different compare pages.
Yeti Pro 4000: +1,952 Wh (+95.6%).
Yeti Pro 4000: +1,400 W (+63.6%).
Yeti Pro 4000: +2,800 W (+63.6%).
Explorer 2000 v2: -76.3 lbs (65.9% lighter).
Delta: Tie (0%).
Out of 53 devices tested, 2 show a different result between these two stations.
Both can run: 45 · Differences: 4% (2/53) · Neither can run: 6
These are 240V or high-voltage devices โ neither station supports them.
Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon)
Central AC (3-Ton)
Electric Water Heater (50 Gal)
Well Pump (1 HP)
Electric Clothes Dryer
RV Rooftop AC (13,500 BTU)
| Spec | Yeti Pro 4000 | Explorer 2000 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 3,993.6 Wh ✓ | 2,042 Wh |
| Running Power | 3,600 W ✓ | 2,200 W |
| Surge Power | 7,200 W ✓ | 4,400 W |
| Weight | 115.7 lbs (52.5 kg) | 39.5 lbs (17.9 kg) ✓ |
| Energy Density | 76.1 Wh/kg | 114.1 Wh/kg ✓ |
| Portability Tier | stationary | portable |
| Chemistry | LFP | LFP |
| Cycle Life | 4,000 | 4,000 |
| Expandable | Yes | No |
| UPS | No | Yes (20 ms) |
| AC Voltage | 120V | 120V |
Best-case charging profile using compatible solar panels.
MPPT: 13.3-145V
MPPT: 16-60V
Charge speed comparison
Longer bar = faster charge (inverted scale)
All tested devices grouped by category. Click a category to expand.
| Device | Yeti Pro 4000 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Box Fan (20-inch) | Safe | 33.7h | Safe | 17.2h |
| Central AC (3-Ton) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Dehumidifier (70 Pint) | Safe | 3.3h | Safe | 1.7h |
| Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) | Safe | 2.6h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Portable AC (12,000 BTU) | Safe | 2.1h | Tight | 1.1h |
| Space Heater (1,500W) | Safe | 1.9h | Safe | 1h |
| Window AC (8,000 BTU) | Safe | 3.9h | Safe | 2h |
| Device | Yeti Pro 4000 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Garage Door Opener (Residential) | Safe | 15.5h | Safe | 7.9h |
| Well Pump (1 HP) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Device | Yeti Pro 4000 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Slice Bread Toaster | Safe | 1.9h | Safe | 1h |
| Coffee Maker | Safe | 1.7h | Safe | 0.9h |
| Digital Air Fryer | Safe | 1.6h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Skillet | Safe | 1.9h | Safe | 1h |
| Electric Stove (Single Burner) | Safe | 1.6h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Water Kettle | Safe | 1.9h | Safe | 1h |
| Instant Pot (6 Qt) | Safe | 1.9h | Safe | 1h |
| Microwave Oven (1000W) | Safe | 1.5h | Safe | 0.7h |
| Rice Cooker | Safe | 3h | Safe | 1.5h |
| Slow Cooker | Safe | 9.3h | Safe | 4.8h |
| Toaster Oven | Safe | 1.6h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Device | Yeti Pro 4000 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dishwasher | Safe | 1.6h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Clothes Dryer | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| French Door Refrigerator | Safe | 13.5h | Safe | 6.9h |
| Washing Machine | Safe | 2.2h | Safe | 1.1h |
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Our methodology
Homeowners who need serious backup power for large appliances and want fast solar recharging should pick the Yeti Pro 4000. The Explorer 2000 v2 suits buyers who prioritize portability and need basic UPS protection for sensitive electronics.
With a score of 95 to 88, the Yeti Pro 4000 is the stronger overall performer and earns our recommendation for most high-demand use cases. In our 53-device benchmark, Yeti Pro 4000 powers 47 devices and Explorer 2000 v2 powers 45.
Yeti Pro 4000 is the stronger overall choice in this matchup based on weighted compatibility across 53 tested devices.
Yeti Pro 4000 has higher battery capacity (3,993.6 Wh), which generally supports longer runtime on the same load.
Yeti Pro 4000 has the faster best-case solar recharge profile in our panel compatibility test set.
Explorer 2000 v2 is lighter at 39.5 lbs vs 115.7 lbs. Explorer 2000 v2 is rated portable for portability.
Yeti Pro 4000 powers 47 of 53 tested devices, compared to 45 for Explorer 2000 v2.
Only Yeti Pro 4000 supports expansion batteries for additional capacity. Explorer 2000 v2 is limited to its built-in 2,042 Wh.
Only Explorer 2000 v2 has UPS (uninterruptible power supply) mode with a 20ms switchover time, which keeps connected devices running during a power outage without interruption.