Capacity
AC200MAX: +6 Wh (+0.3%).
This comparison targets buyers choosing between two 2,200W LFP portable power stations with nearly identical battery capacity (2,048 Wh vs. 2,042 Wh) and the same device-compatibility rate of 45 out of 53 appliances tested. The differences sit in the details.
The AC200MAX delivers a higher 4,800W surge (vs. 4,400W), accepts up to 900W of solar input for a full charge in roughly 7.3 hours, and supports battery expansion for longer off-grid stays. The Explorer 2000 v2 counters with a significant weight advantage at 39.5 lbs, which is over 22 lbs lighter, plus 4,000 cycle longevity and a 20 ms UPS function for sensitive electronics during outages.
The tradeoff is clear: faster solar charging and expandability come at the cost of portability and built-in backup switching.
Overall Winner
AC200MAX
Powers 45 of 53 tested devices
AC200MAX wins overall, but the best pick depends on your use case.
Absolute values shown. Bars are scaled within this comparison for readability.
Each metric is independent. Bar lengths are not comparable across different compare pages.
AC200MAX: +6 Wh (+0.3%).
Delta: Tie (0%).
AC200MAX: +400 W (+9.1%).
Explorer 2000 v2: -22.5 lbs (36.3% lighter).
Explorer 2000 v2: +500 cycles (+14.3%).
These two stations produce the same result on 53 of 53 devices.
Both can run: 45 · Neither can run: 8
These are 240V or high-voltage devices โ neither station supports them.
Central AC (3-Ton)
Electric Water Heater (50 Gal)
Well Pump (1 HP)
Electric Clothes Dryer
RV Rooftop AC (13,500 BTU)
Circular Saw (Corded)
Electric Chainsaw (14-inch)
Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon)
| Spec | AC200MAX | Explorer 2000 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 2,048 Wh ✓ | 2,042 Wh |
| Running Power | 2,200 W | 2,200 W |
| Surge Power | 4,800 W ✓ | 4,400 W |
| Weight | 61.9 lbs (28.1 kg) | 39.5 lbs (17.9 kg) ✓ |
| Energy Density | 72.9 Wh/kg | 114.1 Wh/kg ✓ |
| Portability Tier | heavy | portable |
| Chemistry | LFP | LFP |
| Cycle Life | 3,500 | 4,000 ✓ |
| Expandable | Yes | No |
| UPS | No | Yes (20 ms) |
| AC Voltage | 120V | 120V |
Best-case charging profile using compatible solar panels.
MPPT: 10-145V
MPPT: 16-60V
Charge speed comparison
Longer bar = faster charge (inverted scale)
All tested devices grouped by category. Click a category to expand.
| Device | AC200MAX | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Box Fan (20-inch) | Safe | 17.3h | Safe | 17.2h |
| Central AC (3-Ton) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Dehumidifier (70 Pint) | Safe | 1.7h | Safe | 1.7h |
| Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) | Safe | 1.4h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Portable AC (12,000 BTU) | Tight | 1.1h | Tight | 1.1h |
| Space Heater (1,500W) | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1h |
| Window AC (8,000 BTU) | Safe | 2h | Safe | 2h |
| Device | AC200MAX | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Garage Door Opener (Residential) | Safe | 8h | Safe | 7.9h |
| Well Pump (1 HP) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Device | AC200MAX | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Slice Bread Toaster | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1h |
| Coffee Maker | Safe | 0.9h | Safe | 0.9h |
| Digital Air Fryer | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Skillet | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1h |
| Electric Stove (Single Burner) | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Water Kettle | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1h |
| Instant Pot (6 Qt) | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1h |
| Microwave Oven (1000W) | Safe | 0.7h | Safe | 0.7h |
| Rice Cooker | Safe | 1.5h | Safe | 1.5h |
| Slow Cooker | Safe | 4.8h | Safe | 4.8h |
| Toaster Oven | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Device | AC200MAX | Runtime | Explorer 2000 v2 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dishwasher | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Clothes Dryer | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| French Door Refrigerator | Safe | 6.9h | Safe | 6.9h |
| Washing Machine | Safe | 1.1h | Safe | 1.1h |
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Our methodology
Buyers who prioritize solar speed, surge headroom, and the option to add extra batteries for extended home backup or off-grid use should pick the AC200MAX. The Explorer 2000 v2 is the better fit for anyone who needs to move the unit frequently or wants automatic UPS switching for a home-office setup. Overall, the AC200MAX edges ahead with its stronger solar performance and expansion capability, earning the win by a narrow margin.
AC200MAX is the stronger overall choice in this matchup based on weighted compatibility across 53 tested devices.
AC200MAX has higher battery capacity (2,048 Wh), which generally supports longer runtime on the same load.
AC200MAX has the faster best-case solar recharge profile in our panel compatibility test set.
Explorer 2000 v2 is lighter at 39.5 lbs vs 61.9 lbs. Explorer 2000 v2 is rated portable for portability.
Both power stations can run 45 of 53 tested devices.
Only AC200MAX supports expansion batteries for additional capacity. Explorer 2000 v2 is limited to its built-in 2,042 Wh.
Only Explorer 2000 v2 has UPS (uninterruptible power supply) mode with a 20ms switchover time, which keeps connected devices running during a power outage without interruption.