Capacity
AC200L: +1,530 Wh (+295.1%).
This comparison targets buyers deciding between a full-size home backup station and a lightweight portable unit. The AC200L delivers 2,400W of running power and 2,048 Wh of capacity, enough to handle 43 out of 53 devices tested in our compatibility checks.
The Explorer 500 managed just 20 of those same 53 devices, limited by its 500W output and 518.4 Wh battery. LFP chemistry gives the AC200L roughly 3,000 charge cycles versus around 800 for the Explorer 500, and Bluetti's unit accepts up to 1,200W of solar input for faster off-grid recharging.
Expansion battery support on the AC200L adds even more flexibility for extended outages. The tradeoff is size: the Explorer 500 weighs only 13.2 lbs compared to 62.4 lbs for the AC200L, making it far easier to toss in a car for camping or day trips.
Overall Winner
AC200L
Powers 43 of 53 tested devices vs 20 for Explorer 500
AC200L wins overall, but the best pick depends on your use case.
Absolute values shown. Bars are scaled within this comparison for readability.
Each metric is independent. Bar lengths are not comparable across different compare pages.
AC200L: +1,530 Wh (+295.1%).
AC200L: +1,900 W (+380.0%).
AC200L: +2,600 W (+260.0%).
Explorer 500: -49.2 lbs (78.8% lighter).
AC200L: +2,200 cycles (+275.0%).
Out of 53 devices tested, 23 show a different result between these two stations.
Both can run: 20 · Differences: 43% (23/53) · Neither can run: 10
2-Slice Bread Toaster Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
Coffee Maker Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
Digital Air Fryer Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
Electric Skillet Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
Electric Stove (Single Burner) Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
Electric Water Kettle Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
Instant Pot (6 Qt) Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
Microwave Oven (1000W) Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
Toaster Oven Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
Rice Cooker Explorer 500: Running shortfall
Dehumidifier (70 Pint) Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
Space Heater (1,500W) Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
Window AC (8,000 BTU) Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
Dishwasher Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
Washing Machine Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
Sump Pump (1/2 HP) Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
Desktop PC (Gaming/Workstation) Explorer 500: Running shortfall
EV Charger (Level 1, 120V) Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
Portable Ice Maker (Countertop) Explorer 500: Surge shortfall
Professional Hair Dryer Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
Corded Drill / Hammer Drill Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
Laser Printer Explorer 500: Running + surge shortfall
These devices have startup surges that exceed both stations.
Central AC (3-Ton)
Portable AC (12,000 BTU)
Electric Clothes Dryer
RV Rooftop AC (13,500 BTU)
Circular Saw (Corded)
Electric Chainsaw (14-inch)
Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon)
Shop Vac (Wet/Dry, 5-6 HP Peak)
Electric Water Heater (50 Gal)
Well Pump (1 HP)
| Spec | AC200L | Explorer 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 2,048 Wh ✓ | 518.4 Wh |
| Running Power | 2,400 W ✓ | 500 W |
| Surge Power | 3,600 W ✓ | 1,000 W |
| Weight | 62.4 lbs (28.3 kg) | 13.2 lbs (6.0 kg) ✓ |
| Energy Density | 72.4 Wh/kg | 86.4 Wh/kg ✓ |
| Portability Tier | heavy | ultralight |
| Chemistry | LFP | Other |
| Cycle Life | 3,000 ✓ | 800 |
| Expandable | Yes | No |
| UPS | No | No |
| AC Voltage | 120V | 120V |
Best-case charging profile using compatible solar panels.
MPPT: 12-145V
MPPT: 12-30V
Charge speed comparison
Longer bar = faster charge (inverted scale)
All tested devices grouped by category. Click a category to expand.
| Device | AC200L | Runtime | Explorer 500 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Box Fan (20-inch) | Safe | 17.3h | Safe | 4.4h |
| Central AC (3-Ton) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Dehumidifier (70 Pint) | Tight | 1.7h | Fail | N/A |
| Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) | Safe | 1.4h | Fail | N/A |
| Portable AC (12,000 BTU) | Soft Start | 1.1h | Fail | N/A |
| Space Heater (1,500W) | Safe | 1h | Fail | N/A |
| Window AC (8,000 BTU) | Safe | 2h | Fail | N/A |
| Device | AC200L | Runtime | Explorer 500 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Garage Door Opener (Residential) | Safe | 8h | Safe | 2h |
| Well Pump (1 HP) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Device | AC200L | Runtime | Explorer 500 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Slice Bread Toaster | Safe | 1h | Fail | N/A |
| Coffee Maker | Safe | 0.9h | Fail | N/A |
| Digital Air Fryer | Safe | 0.8h | Fail | N/A |
| Electric Skillet | Safe | 1h | Fail | N/A |
| Electric Stove (Single Burner) | Safe | 0.8h | Fail | N/A |
| Electric Water Kettle | Safe | 1h | Fail | N/A |
| Instant Pot (6 Qt) | Safe | 1h | Fail | N/A |
| Microwave Oven (1000W) | Safe | 0.7h | Fail | N/A |
| Rice Cooker | Safe | 1.5h | Fail | N/A |
| Slow Cooker | Safe | 4.8h | Safe | 1.2h |
| Toaster Oven | Safe | 0.8h | Fail | N/A |
| Device | AC200L | Runtime | Explorer 500 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dishwasher | Safe | 0.8h | Fail | N/A |
| Electric Clothes Dryer | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| French Door Refrigerator | Safe | 6.9h | Safe | 1.8h |
| Washing Machine | Safe | 1.1h | Fail | N/A |
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Our methodology
Buyers who need serious home backup power, broad device coverage, or a solar-ready system with long cycle life should pick the AC200L. The Explorer 500 suits travelers and minimalists who prioritize portability over capacity and only need to run small electronics.
With a score of 83.5 versus 40 and more than twice the device compatibility, the AC200L is the clear winner of this matchup. In our 53-device benchmark, AC200L powers 43 devices and Explorer 500 powers 20.
AC200L is the stronger overall choice in this matchup based on weighted compatibility across 53 tested devices.
AC200L has higher battery capacity (2,048 Wh), which generally supports longer runtime on the same load.
Explorer 500 has the faster best-case solar recharge profile in our panel compatibility test set.
Explorer 500 is lighter at 13.2 lbs vs 62.4 lbs. Explorer 500 is rated ultralight for portability.
AC200L powers 43 of 53 tested devices, compared to 20 for Explorer 500.
Only AC200L supports expansion batteries for additional capacity. Explorer 500 is limited to its built-in 518.4 Wh.