Capacity
Yeti Pro 4000: +1,946 Wh (+95.0%).
This comparison targets buyers weighing a mid-capacity portable unit against a high-capacity powerhouse for home backup, off-grid setups, or heavy appliance coverage. The Yeti Pro 4000 nearly doubles the AC200L in battery capacity (3,993.6 Wh vs. 2,048 Wh) and delivers 3,600W of running power with a 7,200W surge rating, making it far better suited for large loads like air conditioners or well pumps.
It also powered 47 of 53 tested devices compared to the AC200L's 43, earning a higher compatibility score of 95 vs. 83.5. Goal Zero's unit supports up to 3,000W of solar input, opening the door to faster array builds in sustained off-grid scenarios.
The tradeoff is significant: at 115.7 lbs, the Yeti Pro 4000 is nearly twice the weight of the 62.4 lb AC200L, which limits its grab-and-go flexibility.
Overall Winner
Yeti Pro 4000
Powers 47 of 53 tested devices vs 43 for AC200L
Yeti Pro 4000 wins overall, but the best pick depends on your use case.
Absolute values shown. Bars are scaled within this comparison for readability.
Each metric is independent. Bar lengths are not comparable across different compare pages.
Yeti Pro 4000: +1,946 Wh (+95.0%).
Yeti Pro 4000: +1,200 W (+50.0%).
Yeti Pro 4000: +3,600 W (+100.0%).
AC200L: -53.4 lbs (46.1% lighter).
Yeti Pro 4000: +1,000 cycles (+33.3%).
Out of 53 devices tested, 4 show a different result between these two stations.
Both can run: 43 · Differences: 8% (4/53) · Neither can run: 6
These are 240V or high-voltage devices โ neither station supports them.
Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon)
Central AC (3-Ton)
Electric Water Heater (50 Gal)
Well Pump (1 HP)
Electric Clothes Dryer
RV Rooftop AC (13,500 BTU)
| Spec | AC200L | Yeti Pro 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 2,048 Wh | 3,993.6 Wh ✓ |
| Running Power | 2,400 W | 3,600 W ✓ |
| Surge Power | 3,600 W | 7,200 W ✓ |
| Weight | 62.4 lbs (28.3 kg) ✓ | 115.7 lbs (52.5 kg) |
| Energy Density | 72.4 Wh/kg | 76.1 Wh/kg ✓ |
| Portability Tier | heavy | stationary |
| Chemistry | LFP | LFP |
| Cycle Life | 3,000 | 4,000 ✓ |
| Expandable | Yes | Yes |
| UPS | No | No |
| AC Voltage | 120V | 120V |
Best-case charging profile using compatible solar panels.
MPPT: 12-145V
MPPT: 13.3-145V
Charge speed comparison
Longer bar = faster charge (inverted scale)
All tested devices grouped by category. Click a category to expand.
| Device | AC200L | Runtime | Yeti Pro 4000 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Box Fan (20-inch) | Safe | 17.3h | Safe | 33.7h |
| Central AC (3-Ton) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Dehumidifier (70 Pint) | Tight | 1.7h | Safe | 3.3h |
| Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) | Safe | 1.4h | Safe | 2.6h |
| Portable AC (12,000 BTU) | Soft Start | 1.1h | Safe | 2.1h |
| Space Heater (1,500W) | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.9h |
| Window AC (8,000 BTU) | Safe | 2h | Safe | 3.9h |
| Device | AC200L | Runtime | Yeti Pro 4000 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Garage Door Opener (Residential) | Safe | 8h | Safe | 15.5h |
| Well Pump (1 HP) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Device | AC200L | Runtime | Yeti Pro 4000 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Slice Bread Toaster | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.9h |
| Coffee Maker | Safe | 0.9h | Safe | 1.7h |
| Digital Air Fryer | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 1.6h |
| Electric Skillet | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.9h |
| Electric Stove (Single Burner) | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 1.6h |
| Electric Water Kettle | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.9h |
| Instant Pot (6 Qt) | Safe | 1h | Safe | 1.9h |
| Microwave Oven (1000W) | Safe | 0.7h | Safe | 1.5h |
| Rice Cooker | Safe | 1.5h | Safe | 3h |
| Slow Cooker | Safe | 4.8h | Safe | 9.3h |
| Toaster Oven | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 1.6h |
| Device | AC200L | Runtime | Yeti Pro 4000 | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dishwasher | Safe | 0.8h | Safe | 1.6h |
| Electric Clothes Dryer | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| French Door Refrigerator | Safe | 6.9h | Safe | 13.5h |
| Washing Machine | Safe | 1.1h | Safe | 2.2h |
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Our methodology
The AC200L makes sense for buyers who need a capable, expandable LFP station they can actually move without a hand truck, and its 1,200W solar input still delivers a reasonable 7.3-hour charge window. The Yeti Pro 4000 is the pick for whole-home backup or job-site duty where raw capacity, 3,600W output, and 4,000-cycle longevity outweigh portability concerns. Overall, the Yeti Pro 4000 wins this matchup on power, capacity, device coverage, and cycle life.
Yeti Pro 4000 is the stronger overall choice in this matchup based on weighted compatibility across 53 tested devices.
Yeti Pro 4000 has higher battery capacity (3,993.6 Wh), which generally supports longer runtime on the same load.
AC200L has the faster best-case solar recharge profile in our panel compatibility test set.
AC200L is lighter at 62.4 lbs vs 115.7 lbs. AC200L is rated heavy for portability.
Yeti Pro 4000 powers 47 of 53 tested devices, compared to 43 for AC200L.