Capacity
Higher is better | Scale max: 2,048 Wh | AC200L leads
AC200L 2,048 Wh
EB3A 268.8 Wh
AC200L: +1,779 Wh (+661.9%).
AC200L vs EB3A
2,400W
Running power
600W
2,048 Wh
Battery
268.8 Wh
62.4 lbs
Weight
10.1 lbs
At a Glance
This comparison targets buyers deciding between a full-size home backup unit and an ultra-portable daily carry station, both from Bluetti's LFP lineup. The AC200L delivers 2,400W of running power and 2,048 Wh of capacity, enough to handle 43 out of 53 devices in our testing. The EB3A manages 600W and 268.8 Wh, covering 21 of those same 53 devices.
That capacity gap shows up everywhere: the AC200L accepts up to 1,200W of solar input across 20 compatible panels, while the EB3A tops out at 200W from 6 panels. Expandable battery support on the AC200L extends its usefulness for multi-day outages or off-grid setups. The tradeoff is weight.
At 62.4 lbs, the AC200L stays put once you place it; the 10.1 lb EB3A slips into a car, camper, or backpack without a second thought.
Overall Winner
AC200L
Powers 43 of 53 tested devices vs 21 for EB3A
Home backup: AC200L RV / mobile: Tie Solar: AC200L
Choose AC200L if...
- + You want future battery expansion
- + You want broader device compatibility
- + You need all-day runtime headroom
Choose EB3A if...
- + Portability matters (10 lbs vs 62)
- + You want faster solar recharging
Spec Snapshot
Absolute values shown. Bars are scaled within this comparison for readability.
Each metric is independent. Bar lengths are not comparable across different compare pages.
Running Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 2,400 W | AC200L leads
AC200L 2,400 W
EB3A 600 W
AC200L: +1,800 W (+300.0%).
Surge Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 3,600 W | AC200L leads
AC200L 3,600 W
EB3A 1,200 W
AC200L: +2,400 W (+200.0%).
Weight
Lower is better | Scale best: 10.1 lbs | EB3A leads
AC200L 62.4 lbs (28.3 kg)
EB3A 10.1 lbs (4.6 kg)
EB3A: -52.2 lbs (83.7% lighter).
Battery Life
Higher is better | Scale max: 3,000 cycles | AC200L leads
AC200L 3,000 cycles
EB3A 2,500 cycles
AC200L: +500 cycles (+20.0%).
Where Compatibility Actually Differs
Out of 53 devices tested, 22 show a different result between these two stations.
Both can run: 21 · Differences: 42% (22/53) · Neither can run: 10
Only AC200L can run 22
2-Slice Bread Toaster EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Coffee Maker EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Digital Air Fryer EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Electric Skillet EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Electric Stove (Single Burner) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Electric Water Kettle EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Instant Pot (6 Qt) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Microwave Oven (1000W) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Toaster Oven EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Rice Cooker EB3A: Running shortfall
Dehumidifier (70 Pint) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Space Heater (1,500W) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Window AC (8,000 BTU) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Dishwasher EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Washing Machine EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Sump Pump (1/2 HP) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Desktop PC (Gaming/Workstation) EB3A: Running shortfall
EV Charger (Level 1, 120V) EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Professional Hair Dryer EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Corded Drill / Hammer Drill EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Laser Printer EB3A: Running + surge shortfall
Neither can run · 10 devices
These devices have startup surges that exceed both stations.
Central AC (3-Ton)
Portable AC (12,000 BTU)
Electric Clothes Dryer
Circular Saw (Corded)
Electric Chainsaw (14-inch)
Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon)
Shop Vac (Wet/Dry, 5-6 HP Peak)
Electric Water Heater (50 Gal)
Well Pump (1 HP)
RV Rooftop AC (13,500 BTU)
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec | AC200L | EB3A |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 2,048 Wh ✓ | 268.8 Wh |
| Running Power | 2,400 W ✓ | 600 W |
| Surge Power | 3,600 W ✓ | 1,200 W |
| Weight | 62.4 lbs (28.3 kg) | 10.1 lbs (4.6 kg) ✓ |
| Energy Density | 72.4 Wh/kg ✓ | 58.4 Wh/kg |
| Portability Tier | heavy | ultralight |
| Chemistry | LFP | LFP |
| Cycle Life | 3,000 ✓ | 2,500 |
| Expandable | Yes | No |
| UPS | No | No |
| AC Voltage | 120V | 120V |
Solar Charging
Best-case charging profile using compatible solar panels.
AC200L
Max solar input 1,200 W
Connector Proprietary
Full charge time ~7.3h
Compatible panels 20/20
MPPT: 12-145V
EB3A
Faster Max solar input 200 W
Connector DC7909
Full charge time ~2.4h
Compatible panels 6/20
MPPT: 12-28V
Charge speed comparison
Longer bar = faster charge (inverted scale)
Device Compatibility
All tested devices grouped by category. Click a category to expand.
AC200LEB3A
Emergency(2)
2/21/2
2/2
1/2
Entertainment(2)
2/21/2
2/2
1/2
EV & Transportation(2)
2/21/2
2/2
1/2
Heating & Cooling(7)
5/71/7
5/7
1/7
| Device | AC200L | Runtime | EB3A | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Box Fan (20-inch) | Safe | 17.3h | Safe | 2.3h |
| Central AC (3-Ton) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Dehumidifier (70 Pint) | Tight | 1.7h | Fail | N/A |
| Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) | Safe | 1.4h | Fail | N/A |
| Portable AC (12,000 BTU) | Soft Start | 1.1h | Fail | N/A |
| Space Heater (1,500W) | Safe | 1h | Fail | N/A |
| Window AC (8,000 BTU) | Safe | 2h | Fail | N/A |
Home Infrastructure(3)
1/31/3
1/3
1/3
| Device | AC200L | Runtime | EB3A | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Garage Door Opener (Residential) | Safe | 8h | Safe | 1h |
| Well Pump (1 HP) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
Kitchen Appliances(11)
11/111/11
11/11
1/11
| Device | AC200L | Runtime | EB3A | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Slice Bread Toaster | Safe | 1h | Fail | N/A |
| Coffee Maker | Safe | 0.9h | Fail | N/A |
| Digital Air Fryer | Safe | 0.8h | Fail | N/A |
| Electric Skillet | Safe | 1h | Fail | N/A |
| Electric Stove (Single Burner) | Safe | 0.8h | Fail | N/A |
| Electric Water Kettle | Safe | 1h | Fail | N/A |
| Instant Pot (6 Qt) | Safe | 1h | Fail | N/A |
| Microwave Oven (1000W) | Safe | 0.7h | Fail | N/A |
| Rice Cooker | Safe | 1.5h | Fail | N/A |
| Slow Cooker | Safe | 4.8h | Safe | 0.6h |
| Toaster Oven | Safe | 0.8h | Fail | N/A |
Large Appliances(4)
3/41/4
3/4
1/4
| Device | AC200L | Runtime | EB3A | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dishwasher | Safe | 0.8h | Fail | N/A |
| Electric Clothes Dryer | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| French Door Refrigerator | Safe | 6.9h | Safe | 0.9h |
| Washing Machine | Safe | 1.1h | Fail | N/A |
Medical(4)
4/44/4
4/4
4/4
Outdoor & RV(6)
5/65/6
5/6
5/6
Personal Care(2)
2/21/2
2/2
1/2
Power Tools(5)
1/50/5
1/5
0/5
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Our methodology
The Bottom Line
Pick the AC200L if you need serious home backup capacity, broad device coverage, or a solar setup that can pull in 1,200W and scale with expansion batteries. The EB3A makes sense for travelers, car campers, or anyone who only needs to power phones, laptops, and small electronics under 600W. With an overall score of 83.5 versus 41, the AC200L is the clear winner for buyers who prioritize power and versatility over portability.
AC200L vs EB3A FAQ
Q Which is better for home backup, AC200L or EB3A?
AC200L is the stronger overall choice in this matchup based on weighted compatibility across 53 tested devices.
Q Which has longer runtime, AC200L or EB3A?
AC200L has higher battery capacity (2,048 Wh), which generally supports longer runtime on the same load.
Q Which charges faster with solar panels?
EB3A has the faster best-case solar recharge profile in our panel compatibility test set.
Q Which is more portable, AC200L or EB3A?
EB3A is lighter at 10.1 lbs vs 62.4 lbs. EB3A is rated ultralight for portability.
Q How many devices can each power station run?
AC200L powers 43 of 53 tested devices, compared to 21 for EB3A.
Q Can you expand the battery capacity of AC200L or EB3A?
Only AC200L supports expansion batteries for additional capacity. EB3A is limited to its built-in 268.8 Wh.