Capacity
Higher is better | Scale max: 2,048 Wh | AC200L leads
AC180 1,152 Wh
AC200L 2,048 Wh
AC200L: +896 Wh (+77.8%).
AC180 vs AC200L
1,800W
Running power
2,400W
1,152 Wh
Battery
2,048 Wh
36.2 lbs
Weight
62.4 lbs
At a Glance
This comparison targets buyers choosing between two Bluetti LFP stations that share the same battery chemistry but sit in different weight and output classes. The AC200L delivers 2400W of running power and 2048 Wh of capacity, nearly doubling the AC180's 1152 Wh reserve.
It also accepts up to 1200W of solar input versus 500W on the AC180, making it far better suited to large panel arrays and extended off-grid use. In device compatibility testing across 53 appliances, the AC200L powered 43 while the AC180 handled 39, giving the larger unit a clear edge for whole-home backup loads.
Expandable battery support on the AC200L adds future flexibility the AC180 lacks entirely. The tradeoff is significant: at 62.4 lbs, the AC200L weighs nearly twice as much as the 36.2-lb AC180, and it does not offer UPS functionality, which the AC180 provides with a 20 ms switchover.
Overall Winner
AC200L
Powers 43 of 53 tested devices vs 39 for AC180
Home backup: AC200L RV / mobile: AC180 Solar: Tie
AC200L wins overall, but the best pick depends on your use case.
Choose AC180 if...
- + Portability matters (36 lbs vs 62)
- + You want faster solar recharging
- + Built-in UPS with 20ms switchover
Choose AC200L if...
- + You want future battery expansion
- + You want broader device compatibility
- + You need all-day runtime headroom
Spec Snapshot
Absolute values shown. Bars are scaled within this comparison for readability.
Each metric is independent. Bar lengths are not comparable across different compare pages.
Running Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 2,400 W | AC200L leads
AC180 1,800 W
AC200L 2,400 W
AC200L: +600 W (+33.3%).
Surge Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 3,600 W | AC200L leads
AC180 2,700 W
AC200L 3,600 W
AC200L: +900 W (+33.3%).
Weight
Lower is better | Scale best: 36.2 lbs | AC180 leads
AC180 36.2 lbs (16.4 kg)
AC200L 62.4 lbs (28.3 kg)
AC180: -26.2 lbs (42.0% lighter).
Battery Life
Higher is better | Scale max: 3,500 cycles | AC180 leads
AC180 3,500 cycles
AC200L 3,000 cycles
AC180: +500 cycles (+16.7%).
Where Compatibility Actually Differs
Out of 53 devices tested, 4 show a different result between these two stations.
Both can run: 39 · Differences: 8% (4/53) · Neither can run: 10
Neither can run · 10 devices
These devices have startup surges that exceed both stations.
Central AC (3-Ton)
Portable AC (12,000 BTU)
Circular Saw (Corded)
Electric Chainsaw (14-inch)
Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon)
Shop Vac (Wet/Dry, 5-6 HP Peak)
Electric Water Heater (50 Gal)
Well Pump (1 HP)
Electric Clothes Dryer
RV Rooftop AC (13,500 BTU)
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec | AC180 | AC200L |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1,152 Wh | 2,048 Wh ✓ |
| Running Power | 1,800 W | 2,400 W ✓ |
| Surge Power | 2,700 W | 3,600 W ✓ |
| Weight | 36.2 lbs (16.4 kg) ✓ | 62.4 lbs (28.3 kg) |
| Energy Density | 70.2 Wh/kg | 72.4 Wh/kg ✓ |
| Portability Tier | portable | heavy |
| Chemistry | LFP | LFP |
| Cycle Life | 3,500 ✓ | 3,000 |
| Expandable | No | Yes |
| UPS | Yes (20 ms) | No |
| AC Voltage | 120V | 120V |
Solar Charging
Best-case charging profile using compatible solar panels.
AC180
Faster Max solar input 500 W
Connector DC7909
Full charge time ~4.1h
Compatible panels 19/20
MPPT: 12-60V
AC200L
Max solar input 1,200 W
Connector Proprietary
Full charge time ~7.3h
Compatible panels 20/20
MPPT: 12-145V
Charge speed comparison
Longer bar = faster charge (inverted scale)
Device Compatibility
All tested devices grouped by category. Click a category to expand.
AC180AC200L
Emergency(2)
1/22/2
1/2
2/2
| Device | AC180 | Runtime | AC200L | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-Size Freezer (15-17 Cu. Ft.) | Safe | 5h | Safe | 9h |
| Sump Pump (1/2 HP) | Soft Start | 0.7h | Tight | 1.3h |
Entertainment(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
EV & Transportation(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
Heating & Cooling(7)
4/75/7
4/7
5/7
| Device | AC180 | Runtime | AC200L | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Box Fan (20-inch) | Safe | 9.7h | Safe | 17.3h |
| Central AC (3-Ton) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Dehumidifier (70 Pint) | Soft Start | 0.9h | Tight | 1.7h |
| Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) | Tight | 0.8h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Portable AC (12,000 BTU) | Soft Start | 0.6h | Soft Start | 1.1h |
| Space Heater (1,500W) | Safe | 0.5h | Safe | 1h |
| Window AC (8,000 BTU) | Safe | 1.1h | Safe | 2h |
Home Infrastructure(3)
1/31/3
1/3
1/3
| Device | AC180 | Runtime | AC200L | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Garage Door Opener (Residential) | Safe | 4.5h | Safe | 8h |
| Well Pump (1 HP) | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
Kitchen Appliances(11)
10/1111/11
10/11
11/11
| Device | AC180 | Runtime | AC200L | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Slice Bread Toaster | Safe | 0.5h | Safe | 1h |
| Coffee Maker | Safe | 0.5h | Safe | 0.9h |
| Digital Air Fryer | Tight | 0.5h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Skillet | Safe | 0.5h | Safe | 1h |
| Electric Stove (Single Burner) | Tight | 0.4h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Water Kettle | Safe | 0.5h | Safe | 1h |
| Instant Pot (6 Qt) | Safe | 0.6h | Safe | 1h |
| Microwave Oven (1000W) | Fail | N/A | Safe | 0.7h |
| Rice Cooker | Safe | 0.9h | Safe | 1.5h |
| Slow Cooker | Safe | 2.7h | Safe | 4.8h |
| Toaster Oven | Tight | 0.4h | Safe | 0.8h |
Large Appliances(4)
3/43/4
3/4
3/4
| Device | AC180 | Runtime | AC200L | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dishwasher | Tight | 0.4h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Clothes Dryer | Voltage Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| French Door Refrigerator | Safe | 3.9h | Safe | 6.9h |
| Washing Machine | Safe | 0.6h | Safe | 1.1h |
Medical(4)
4/44/4
4/4
4/4
Outdoor & RV(6)
5/65/6
5/6
5/6
Personal Care(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
Power Tools(5)
0/51/5
0/5
1/5
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Our methodology
The Bottom Line
Buyers who prioritize portability and need a lightweight backup with UPS capability should pick the AC180; its 36.2-lb frame and 20 ms transfer time make it practical for desktop and networking gear. The AC200L is the stronger choice for anyone running higher-draw appliances, building a solar charging system, or planning to expand storage later. With an overall score of 83.5 versus 73.5, the AC200L is the recommended pick for most use cases.
AC180 vs AC200L FAQ
Q Which is better for home backup, AC180 or AC200L?
AC200L is the stronger overall choice in this matchup based on weighted compatibility across 53 tested devices.
Q Which has longer runtime, AC180 or AC200L?
AC200L has higher battery capacity (2,048 Wh), which generally supports longer runtime on the same load.
Q Which charges faster with solar panels?
AC180 has the faster best-case solar recharge profile in our panel compatibility test set.
Q Which is more portable, AC180 or AC200L?
AC180 is lighter at 36.2 lbs vs 62.4 lbs. AC180 is rated portable for portability.
Q How many devices can each power station run?
AC200L powers 43 of 53 tested devices, compared to 39 for AC180.
Q Can you expand the battery capacity of AC180 or AC200L?
Only AC200L supports expansion batteries for additional capacity. AC180 is limited to its built-in 1,152 Wh.
Q Does AC180 or AC200L have UPS mode for power outages?
Only AC180 has UPS (uninterruptible power supply) mode with a 20ms switchover time, which keeps connected devices running during a power outage without interruption.