Capacity
Higher is better | Scale max: 3,840 Wh | Anker SOLIX F3800 leads
Anker SOLIX F3800 3,840 Wh
Explorer 2000 Plus 2,042 Wh
Anker SOLIX F3800: +1,798 Wh (+88.1%).
Anker SOLIX F3800 vs Explorer 2000 Plus
VS
6,000W
Running power
3,000W
3,840 Wh
Battery
2,042 Wh
132.3 lbs
Weight
61.5 lbs
At a Glance
This comparison targets buyers choosing between two expandable LFP power stations that sit at different ends of the capacity and output spectrum. The Anker SOLIX F3800 delivers 6,000W of running power and 3,840 Wh of stored energy, nearly doubling the Explorer 2000 Plus on both counts.
That extra muscle shows in device compatibility: the F3800 powered 52 of 53 tested appliances versus 47 for the Jackery unit, earning a score of 100 to the Explorer's 93. Surge capacity follows the same gap, with the Anker hitting 9,000W against 6,000W for the 2000 Plus.
The tradeoff is significant, though. At 132.3 lbs, the F3800 weighs more than twice the Jackery's 61.5 lbs, and the Explorer 2000 Plus offers 4,000 rated cycles compared to 3,000 for the Anker, giving it a longer projected battery lifespan.
Overall Winner
Anker SOLIX F3800
Powers 52 of 53 tested devices vs 47 for Explorer 2000 Plus
Home backup: Anker SOLIX F3800 RV / mobile: Explorer 2000 Plus Solar: Tie
Anker SOLIX F3800 wins overall, but the best pick depends on your use case.
Choose Anker SOLIX F3800 if...
- + You need 240V-capable loads
- + You want broader device compatibility
- + You need all-day runtime headroom
Choose Explorer 2000 Plus if...
- + Portability matters (62 lbs vs 132)
- + You want faster solar recharging
Spec Snapshot
Absolute values shown. Bars are scaled within this comparison for readability.
Each metric is independent. Bar lengths are not comparable across different compare pages.
Running Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 6,000 W | Anker SOLIX F3800 leads
Anker SOLIX F3800 6,000 W
Explorer 2000 Plus 3,000 W
Anker SOLIX F3800: +3,000 W (+100.0%).
Surge Power
Higher is better | Scale max: 9,000 W | Anker SOLIX F3800 leads
Anker SOLIX F3800 9,000 W
Explorer 2000 Plus 6,000 W
Anker SOLIX F3800: +3,000 W (+50.0%).
Weight
Lower is better | Scale best: 61.5 lbs | Explorer 2000 Plus leads
Anker SOLIX F3800 132.3 lbs (60.0 kg)
Explorer 2000 Plus 61.5 lbs (27.9 kg)
Explorer 2000 Plus: -70.8 lbs (53.5% lighter).
Battery Life
Higher is better | Scale max: 4,000 cycles | Explorer 2000 Plus leads
Anker SOLIX F3800 3,000 cycles
Explorer 2000 Plus 4,000 cycles
Explorer 2000 Plus: +1,000 cycles (+33.3%).
Where Compatibility Actually Differs
Out of 53 devices tested, 5 show a different result between these two stations.
Both can run: 47 · Differences: 9% (5/53) · Neither can run: 1
Only Anker SOLIX F3800 can run 5
Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) Explorer 2000 Plus: Voltage mismatch
Well Pump (1 HP) Explorer 2000 Plus: Voltage mismatch
Electric Clothes Dryer Explorer 2000 Plus: Voltage mismatch
RV Rooftop AC (13,500 BTU) Explorer 2000 Plus: Needs soft-start
Pancake Air Compressor (6-Gallon) Explorer 2000 Plus: Needs soft-start
Neither can run · 1 devices
These devices have startup surges that exceed both stations.
Central AC (3-Ton)
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec | Anker SOLIX F3800 | Explorer 2000 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 3,840 Wh ✓ | 2,042 Wh |
| Running Power | 6,000 W ✓ | 3,000 W |
| Surge Power | 9,000 W ✓ | 6,000 W |
| Weight | 132.3 lbs (60.0 kg) | 61.5 lbs (27.9 kg) ✓ |
| Energy Density | 64.0 Wh/kg | 73.2 Wh/kg ✓ |
| Portability Tier | stationary | heavy |
| Chemistry | LFP | LFP |
| Cycle Life | 3,000 | 4,000 ✓ |
| Expandable | Yes | Yes |
| UPS | No | No |
| AC Voltage | 120V/240V | 120V |
Solar Charging
Best-case charging profile using compatible solar panels.
Anker SOLIX F3800
Max solar input 2,400 W
Connector XT60
Full charge time ~13.7h
Compatible panels 19/20
MPPT: 11-60V
Explorer 2000 Plus
Faster Max solar input 1,400 W
Connector DC8020
Full charge time ~7.3h
Compatible panels 19/20
MPPT: 11-60V
Charge speed comparison
Longer bar = faster charge (inverted scale)
Device Compatibility
All tested devices grouped by category. Click a category to expand.
Anker SOLIX F3800Explorer 2000 Plus
Emergency(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
Entertainment(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
EV & Transportation(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
Heating & Cooling(7)
6/76/7
6/7
6/7
| Device | Anker SOLIX F3800 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 Plus | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Box Fan (20-inch) | Safe | 32.4h | Safe | 17.2h |
| Central AC (3-Ton) | Fail | N/A | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Dehumidifier (70 Pint) | Safe | 3.1h | Safe | 1.7h |
| Gas Furnace Fan (Blower) | Safe | 2.5h | Safe | 1.4h |
| Portable AC (12,000 BTU) | Safe | 2h | Safe | 1.1h |
| Space Heater (1,500W) | Safe | 1.8h | Safe | 1h |
| Window AC (8,000 BTU) | Safe | 3.8h | Safe | 2h |
Home Infrastructure(3)
3/31/3
3/3
1/3
| Device | Anker SOLIX F3800 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 Plus | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Water Heater (50 Gal) | Tight | 0.5h | Voltage Fail | N/A |
| Garage Door Opener (Residential) | Safe | 14.9h | Safe | 7.9h |
| Well Pump (1 HP) | Safe | 1.1h | Voltage Fail | N/A |
Kitchen Appliances(11)
11/1111/11
11/11
11/11
| Device | Anker SOLIX F3800 | Runtime | Explorer 2000 Plus | Runtime |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Slice Bread Toaster | Safe | 1.8h | Safe | 1h |
| Coffee Maker | Safe | 1.7h | Safe | 0.9h |
| Digital Air Fryer | Safe | 1.6h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Skillet | Safe | 1.8h | Safe | 1h |
| Electric Stove (Single Burner) | Safe | 1.5h | Safe | 0.8h |
| Electric Water Kettle | Safe | 1.8h | Safe | 1h |
| Instant Pot (6 Qt) | Safe | 1.8h | Safe | 1h |
| Microwave Oven (1000W) | Safe | 1.4h | Safe | 0.7h |
| Rice Cooker | Safe | 2.9h | Safe | 1.5h |
| Slow Cooker | Safe | 9h | Safe | 4.8h |
| Toaster Oven | Safe | 1.5h | Safe | 0.8h |
Large Appliances(4)
4/43/4
4/4
3/4
Medical(4)
4/44/4
4/4
4/4
Outdoor & RV(6)
6/65/6
6/6
5/6
Personal Care(2)
2/22/2
2/2
2/2
Power Tools(5)
5/54/5
5/5
4/5
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Our methodology
The Bottom Line
Buyers who need whole-home backup power or must run high-draw appliances like air conditioners and electric dryers should pick the Anker SOLIX F3800 for its 6,000W output and broader device coverage. The Explorer 2000 Plus makes more sense for users who prioritize portability and long-term cycle life, since it weighs just 61.5 lbs and is rated for 4,000 cycles. Overall, the F3800 is the stronger performer and the recommended choice for anyone whose power demands outweigh the need to move the unit frequently.
Anker SOLIX F3800 vs Explorer 2000 Plus FAQ
Q Which is better for home backup, Anker SOLIX F3800 or Explorer 2000 Plus?
Anker SOLIX F3800 is the stronger overall choice in this matchup based on weighted compatibility across 53 tested devices.
Q Which has longer runtime, Anker SOLIX F3800 or Explorer 2000 Plus?
Anker SOLIX F3800 has higher battery capacity (3,840 Wh), which generally supports longer runtime on the same load.
Q Which charges faster with solar panels?
Explorer 2000 Plus has the faster best-case solar recharge profile in our panel compatibility test set.
Q Which is more portable, Anker SOLIX F3800 or Explorer 2000 Plus?
Explorer 2000 Plus is lighter at 61.5 lbs vs 132.3 lbs. Explorer 2000 Plus is rated heavy for portability.
Q How many devices can each power station run?
Anker SOLIX F3800 powers 52 of 53 tested devices, compared to 47 for Explorer 2000 Plus.